AUS: Winemakers' Federation wins UK agents legal ruling

Most popular

Should Pernod dump wine, bunk up with Brown-Forman

Why Brown-Forman will be one of spirits' winners

Retaliatory tariffs "wild card" for Brown-Forman

The future of cannabis in the drinks industry


The Winemakers' Federation of Australia has said that its intervention in a legal case has resulted in additional protection for Australian wine companies exporting to the UK via commercial agents.
In early 2006, in the case of Lonsdale v Howard & Hallam Ltd, the English Court of Appeal ruled that a commercial agent should receive compensation based on the value of the agency business, including goodwill, in circumstances where a brand owner terminated an agency agreement.
But the WFA argued that this opened the door for agents to claim compensation for goodwill irrespective of whether the agent would retain any goodwill for himself by supplying customers with products from another source or  the goodwill was pre-existing or generated by the companies themselves.
"Whilst not restricted to winery businesses, the Winemakers' Federation recognised that this decision would generate excessive and unfair claims by UK agents, running into the millions of dollars, and act as a major constraint for Australian wineries seeking to change agents," the WFA said.
Consequently, when the agent appealed to the UK House of Lords the Federation applied for, and was granted, permission to intervene and argue that the ruling should be qualified.
On 4 July 2007 the House of Lords rejected the agent's appeal but took the opportunity to issue guidance on how compensation awards should be assessed and, crucially, accepted the Federation's submission that any goodwill the agent retains by selling rival producers' goods to the same customers should be excluded.
The Law Lords did not expressly rule on the Federation's second argument, namely that the valuation should exclude goodwill the agent hasn't generated or helped to preserve, however the Federation's UK solicitor, Andrew Park of APP Law, said that "it can in our view be argued quite strongly that this was implicitly accepted or taken as read".
Winemakers' Federation chief executive Stephen Strachan welcomed the decision benefiting Australia's wineries exporting to the UK.
"The original decision on acceptable compensation for UK agents on termination of agreements was unfair and excessive, with huge ramifications for Australia's wineries in their largest export market," he said.
"We were being faced with restrictions around agency selection and agreements as well as major financial burdens. The Winemakers' Federation has always fought for fair trading conditions in our wine export markets and this was a constraint we felt it imperative to contest," said Strachan.
"We applaud the commonsense decision reached by the UK House of Lords and thank our legal representatives APP Law for their support in allowing the continuance of equitable trading for Australian wine companies in the UK market."

Sectors: Wine

Related Content

Is the UK not OK? - The just-drinks analyst

Is the UK not OK? - The just-drinks analyst...

UK drinks producers risk rules of origin 'Hard Brexit' - research

UK drinks producers risk rules of origin 'Hard Brexit' - research...

Australia’s upper-end wines

Australia’s upper-end wines "not cutting through" in UK – Berry Bros & Rudd CEO...

The Lidl effect on the changing off-trade landscape - Interview, Lidl's UK head of beer, wine & spirits, part I

The Lidl effect on the changing off-trade landscape - Interview, Lidl's UK head of beer, wine & spir...

Oops! This article is copy protected.

Why can’t I copy the text on this page?

The ability to copy articles is specially reserved for people who are part of a group membership.

How do I become a group member?

To find out how you and your team can copy and share articles and save money as part of a group membership call Sean Clinton on
+44 (0)1527 573 736 or complete this form..

Forgot your password?