News

US: DISCUS defends self-regulatory code

Most popular

Budweiser Brewing Group - The end of A-B InBev?

Carlsberg's priorities for the years ahead

A-B InBev - getting ready for Heineken in China?

The just-drinks Analyst returns

Molson Coors - Present and future

MORE
The Distilled Spirits Council (DISCUS), the US spirits trade association, has refuted claims by the Marin Institute that self-regulation is not working.
Joan 'Jodie' Bernstein, formerly director of the Federal Trade Commission's Bureau of Consumer Protection and now an external advisor to the DISCUS Code and Code Review Board, said: "It [the code] has several public benefits and has carved the path for responsible corporate citizenship. 
"Among these benefits that set the distilled spirits industry apart, is that the Distilled Spirits Council was the first industry trade group that I am aware of that published transparent reports on the disposition of advertising complaints."
Her comments came after a report by the California-based Marin Institute last week attacked alcohol companies in the US for failing to provide an adequate complaint system for advertising in the country.
Bernstein added: "DISCUS members and non-members voluntarily adhere to a rigorous set of standards against which they are regularly measured. The comprehensive provisions of the DISCUS Code cover conduct that people care about and that the Government cannot and does not address due to the First Amendment and other constraints."
Bernstein also suggested that the self-regulatory system is quicker in responding to specific complaints and technological developments than official regulators. 
The Marin Institute report had suggested that alcohol companies with representation on the DISCUS board had a three times lower chance of their advert being found in violation of the code, and that it was the "quintessential example of the fox guarding the hen house".
The Marin Institute is a pressure group that campaigns for tighter regulation of the alcohol industry and higher taxes. In its mission statement, it states that it "envisions communities free of the alcohol industry's negative influence" and "fights to protect the public from the impact of the alcohol industry's negative practices".

Sectors: Spirits

Related Content

"No impact" from cannabis legalisation on US spirits sales - study...

Ten things you need to know about spirits in the US - Focus

Ten things you need to know about spirits in the US - Focus...

US spirits group hails proposed tax drop

US spirits group hails proposed tax drop...

US alcohol industry rails against Kroger shelf plan

US alcohol industry rails against Kroger shelf plan...

Oops! This article is copy protected.

Why can’t I copy the text on this page?

The ability to copy articles is specially reserved for people who are part of a group membership.

How do I become a group member?

To find out how you and your team can copy and share articles and save money as part of a group membership call Sean Clinton on
+44 (0)1527 573 736 or complete this form..



Forgot your password?