Blog: Will the real scientists please stand up?
Olly Wehring | 30 July 2008
Another day, another pile of public money thrown onto the proverbial bonfire in the name of scientific research.
A researcher in the US has come to the inspired conclusion that young people who consume energy drinks regularly (that's on six or more days per month) are more likely to have unsafe sex, get involved in fights and take illegal drugs. They're also more likely to ride in cars without fastening their seatbelts.
This is because energy drinks encourage people to take risks, says the study from the University at Buffalo's Research Institute on Addictions (RIA). Or is it that risk-takers are attracted to energy drinks? The press release finds it hard to decide.
Nearly 800 male and female undergraduate students were surveyed.
By a similar token, I could argue that people who drink expensive cocktails are more likely to buy frivolous luxuries such as shoes and handbags, rather than, say, give their money to environmental charities.
Perhaps a US government organisation would like to pay me US$471,000 to investigate. After all, that's how much the National Institute of Drug Abuse dished out for this energy drinks survey.
I'm not getting into the arguments here about regulation on energy drinks and their various ingredients – and there are some serious ones to be made on both sides. This blog is about bad science. I'm sure the RIA findings have been honestly reported, but is there really a causal link here?
It seems that every day the world wide web is packed with new studies, either claiming one thing or disproving the other but always masquerading as proper science. Flooding the world with this fluff is really not going to help regulatory authorities, and often only degenerates into mud-slinging between opposing groups.
Of course, it can also be used as a cheap space filler for some of us lot in the media.
At least RIA study author Kathleen Miller PhD was sensible enough to include a qualifier in her report: “Although energy drink consumption can be used to predict other problem behaviours, it does not necessarily follow that drinking these substances is a gateway to more serious health-compromising activities.”
She added: “It is entirely possible that a common factor, such as a sensation-seeking personality or involvement in risk-oriented peer sub-cultures, contributes to both. More investigation is needed to study these relationships further, over longer periods of time.”
Judge for yourself readers: Energy drinks linked to risk-taking behaviours among college students
Today is SABMiller's final day. Some time this evening, Brussel's time, the second-biggest brewer in the world will be subsumed into the biggest, creating a beer behemoth of unprecedented proportions....
No, this is not PepsiCo's new ad slogan for its Mountain Dew brand....
Major wine players flocked to China ready for online giant Alibaba's 9.9 Global Wine and Spirits Festival, which took place on 9 September....
In May, Heineken's CEO, Jean-François van Boxmeer, called Vietnam the "poster child" for international beer thanks to strong demographics and growing demand....
- The end is nigh for Global Travel Retail - Comment
- Five ways small brands can beat big players
- Interview, Bulldog Gin founder Anshuman Vohra
- Pernod Ricard's Q1 results - Preview
- Pernod Ricard Q1 2017 results by region, brand
- Diageo most at risk to Thai alcohol ban - analyst
- Jobs at new India hub won't affect staff - Diageo
- Stumbling UK Pound prompts Conviviality price hike
- US craft spirits could be as big as craft beer
- AB InBev fund ZX Ventures buys homebrew co
- Global gin insights - market forecasts, product innovation and consumer trends
- Global Scotch whisky insights - market forecasts, product innovation and consumer trends
- Global rum insights - market forecasts, product innovation and consumer trends
- Global Wine Market 2016-2020
- Global RTD insights - market forecasts, product innovation and consumer trends