US: Bourbon capital Kentucky angers distillers with tax rise

By | 3 April 2009

Bourbon distillers have been left incensed by the introduction of a tax rise on alcohol in their Kentucky homeland, also one of their strongest markets.

Kentucky's state government this week implemented a 6% tax rise on alcohol and tobacco. Informally termed the 'sin tax', critics have accused the authorities of seeking to plug a $456m budget deficit rather than raising taxes out of public health concerns.

The rise is just one of several tax rises on alcohol that have been proposed across a number of US states this year, something the US Distilled Spirits Council (Discus) has warned could lead to 150,000 job losses in the country's hospitality sector.

The Kentucky rise is one that has particularly angered distillers, due to the state's position as the "Capital of Bourbon". Kentucky accounts for around 90% of Bourbon production.

"The tax increase in Kentucky that took effect this week is misguided and sends the wrong message to consumers, the homestate bourbon industry, and the hard-working men and women who produce America's native spirit," said a spokesperson for Beam Global Spirits & Wine, the drinks arm of Fortune Brands and producer of Bourbon brands Maker's Mark and Jim Beam.

"Ironically, the tax increase could backfire if Kentucky consumers begin purchasing spirits in neighboring states with lower taxes," Beam told just-drinks today (3 April).

Kentucky-based Beam rival, Brown-Forman, which owns Jack Daniel whiskey, has taken out adverts in local newspapers this week to attack the tax rise.

Anecdotal reports suggest consumers have been stocking up on Bourbon and other alcoholic drinks prior to the implementation of the tax rise.

Discus has asked states not to harm the drinks industry as it attempts to handle one of the worst US recessions for a generation.

Sectors: Spirits

Companies: Beam Global, Fortune Brands, Brown-Forman

View next/previous articles

Currently reading -

US: Bourbon capital Kentucky angers distillers with tax rise

There are currently 5 comments on this article

The 2 bourbons you mentioned are not worth a hill of beans. I still maintain that BF's interest is that Tenn. is too close to Ky., and Tenn. with their Jack Daniels would really give then cause for being against the tax.

Norman Weiner..USA

 

Norman weiner said at 1:46 pm, April 25, 2009

Reply to this comment

Related articles

Insight - Russia's beer tax hike threatens brewers' profits

Russia's Government is pressing ahead with its proposal to triple tax on beer from the start of 2010, according to Carlsberg, in a move that analysts believe could significantly damage brewers' profits.

Comment - Lower alcohol wine

The future looks bright for wines with a lower alcohol content in the UK, if only someone could decide on what to call them.

just the round-up - The week in drinks

The top ten stories published on just-drinks this week:

just-drinks tagline

Not a member? Join here

Decrease font sizeDecrease font sizeDecrease font size Increase font sizeIncrease font sizeIncrease font size Comment on this article Email this to a friend Print this page